New Dura-Ace News!!

Bicycle related chatter & discussion
User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 15 Mar 2008, 11:10

Just thought i'd let you know what i've read so far. This text from weightweenies seems to cover most things. I'll put some pictures up when they're available, as the ones i've seen so far don't have enough detail (mostly action shots of pros on prototypes).
More news from the boys at CompetitiveCyclist.com:

"Most of the press we've seen in the last few months about the new-for-2009 Shimano Dura Ace has focused on the electronic version of DA. Stefan Schumacher medaled on eDA at last year's World Championship Road Race, and he and his Gerolsteiner team mates have served as guinea pigs for eDA ever since. While the pure novelty of electronic shifting tantalizes, we got our own medals (for bravery) for fighting at the Battle of Zap and Battle of Mektronic. While we're intrigued by the alleged telepathic shift quality of eDA, it's hard to shed our concerns for its weight, its durability, and its reliability.

The excitement over eDA has been noisy, and it's obscured an underappreciated fact: Along with eDA, Shimano is also releasing a new version of non-electronic DA. It'll be known as Dura Ace 7900, and we've finally seen our first confirmed technical details about 7900. The purpose of this What's New posting is to shed some light on what you'll be seeing in the new-for-2009 non-electronic Dura Ace.

Here's what we DON'T know about Dura Ace 7900: Weight and cost. As soon as we get this info, we'll pass it along. But, for now, all we have is basic technical info. And, sorry, we don't have photos either.

Here's what we DO know, on a component-by-component basis:

STI Levers -

Say farewell to exposed shifter housing. Shimano is making the change to under-the-bar-tape cable routing They refer to it as "integral shift cables". We wonder if Shimano-sponsored pros will find digging deep on the front a but tougher without shift cables to grab on for stability…
"Better access to the lever from upper side with closer pivot." Our interpretation of this means that the shape of the brake hood will be different. We've never enjoyed the deep hook of DA brake hoods, and to our ears it sounds like Shimano is modifying the shape to make it more SRAM/Campy-like. In other words, no more plunging hook, and instead you'll see a flatter hood. Beyond the ergonomic improvement, Shimano also claims this leads to smoother braking.
You get a reach adjustment mechanism. This is a nice feature of SRAM Red, as well. Folks with small hands should be very pleased.
20% shorter stroke to achieve shift engagement on the right lever.
Weight savings thanks to the use of a carbon brake lever and a titanium fixing band & bolt.
Rear Derailleur -

Carbon! The pulley plate will be made from carbon fiber. Shimano is a company built on their commitment to the forging of alloys, so any sort of branching out into composites is a big, big deal.
Increased chain wrap capacity. In other words, you can use a wide range of gears (e.g. a 50/34 & an 11/2 without having to resort to a "Triple" rear derailleur.
You get an "enhanced pulling cable method" with an audible click when the shift is complete. But the price of superior shifting is this: Dura Ace 7900 STI Levers and the 7900 Rear Derailleur will not be compatible with current 7800-series Dura Ace.
Front Derailleur -

Shimano claims that your days of trimming the front derailleur are over. No trimming will be required. This is a pretty big coup when you compare it to SRAM, since one big upside of Red (in comparison to their Force and Rival gruppos) was its inclusion of FD trim.
The FD spring tension has been re-tooled to achieve "featherlight downshifting".
Crankset -

Put aside your sugar-plum visions of a DA Carbon crankset. Rather, Shimano has forged their 7900-series aluminum crank with even thinner walls to make it lighter than any production carbon crankset in the marketplace.
When you use the 7900-series crankset with the new 7900-series chain, you'll get no front derailleur rub thanks to its new chainring/spider design. This also allegedly provides improved power transfer, thanks to the superior mating of chain and chainring.
More weight savings comes from its new aluminum/carbon composite BB axle.
Shimano will also introduce a 7950 version of the crankset, with 50/34 chainrings. This will be the first-ever Dura Ace compact crank (a full, what, 7 years since FSA introduced theirs?)
Chain -

The 7900 chain is known as the "Super Narrow" chain. The redesigned outer plate resists chain suck, and the new design of both the inner & outer plate mesh with the chainrings with such precision that Shimano claims it reduces mechanical friction by 0.6%. We're a bit unsure how to parse what that 0.6% converts to…Does that mean an extra 2.4w when you're making a 400w effort? We're unsure, and we're eager for a fuller explanation. Perhaps more important is the fact that Shimano also says it's a quieter chain.
The 7900-series chain has hollow pins and perforated plates to further reduce weight.
Shimano will introduce a "Quick Link" for its 10-speed chains. Our impression is that this means tool-free installation.
Cassette -

Like the chain and the crankset, the cassette sprockets get fine-tuned to optimize shifting, and the cog carrier is a lighter-than-ever aluminum.
You'll see a wider array of cassette ratio options. In addition to all of the options you get in 7800, you'll also see an 11/25, 11/27, and an 11/28. Before you laugh at the 11/28, keep in mind that this is SRAM's #1 selling cassette ratio! All the ratios made in the 7800 will be produced as 7900-series models as well.
Brake Calipers -

Dig this: "Enhanced brake arch proportion." We think this means that you get quicker caliper response when you hit your brake lever, and perhaps better stiffness under heavy braking. We suspect that this is a photo of the new brake. Interestingly, the boys over at the Weight Weenies forum pointed out that this poor rider appears to have his brake shoes on the wrong side…
Lower profile outer cable stop. This improves cable routing, which decreases drag and improves the snappiness of the lever. If you've ever installed a set of Zero Gravity brakes, you know that fine-tuned brake cable routing is something you should never take for granted.
The brake pad compound changes. Shimano claims that the improvement will be most noticeable in the wet, where stopping power improves 210%. In the dry, you should expect a 120% improvement in stopping power.
Add'l titanium hardware saves overall weight.
Flight Deck Computer -

It's still integrated into the STI levers, but the functionality gets much broader -- It includes a heart rate monitor, altimeter, and an inclinometer. It's a full-on 2.4GHz wireless system, and you can even download data wirelessly onto your PC.
A final note on our understanding about backwards compatibility:

Rear Drivetain -- The 7900 system is only compatible with other 7900 components. The 7900 rear derailleur is compatible with 7800-series cassettes, but that's it. There is no other cross-compatibility. This also means that 7800-series components cannot be used in piecemeal with 7900 if your plan is to upgrade one component at a time. More or less, you'll need to upgrade to 7900 STI, rear derailleur, cassette, and chain in one fell swoop.

Front Drivetrain -- Same story. There's an Iron Curtain between 7900 and 7800. The only kinda, sorta compatibility is between the 7900 front derailleur and the 7800 crankset. Shimano states "slower shifting may occur depending on frame dimension" if you choose to mix things like this. We're not sure if "dimension" means frame size or geometry or what. But we can't imagine someone running a full 7800 bike with the exception of a 7900 front derailleur, so it's not something we're terribly worried about.

Brake Systems -- The 7900 STI Levers are compatible with 7800-series brake calipers.

We're looking at a best-case scenario of a late September 2008 delivery timeline. We're sure it'll be all over the '08 Tour de France, and in full force at the Eurobike tradeshow shortly thereafter. But in terms of delivery, if it's before Halloween, we'll be stoked."
Seems like i'll be saving for this, and my carbon wheels will have to wait, though hopefully i can have both.

User avatar
jimmy
Posts: 988
Joined: 13 Nov 2006, 10:15
Contact:

Postby jimmy » 15 Mar 2008, 13:24

The biggest issue I can see with that, is are Shimano going to continue to produce pre 2009 Dura-Ace parts so people aren't forced to upgrade their entire component set?

My cynicism says no.

That means that when someone needs a new rear rerailler (say), and they can't get a Shimano one that will work with their current groupset, they need to do a complete upgrade. At that point, they have a decision, do they stick with Shimano, or move to one of the other brands?

James

User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 15 Mar 2008, 14:27

They'll still sell them for a fair while. Even if not Dura-Ace, people can settle for Ultegra, 105, Tiagra, and if it gets really bad Sora. Anyway, how often do you need a new rear derrailleur??

User avatar
weiyun
Posts: 4173
Joined: 17 Nov 2006, 22:32
Location: Birchgrove
Contact:

Postby weiyun » 15 Mar 2008, 15:45

Don't quite understand why there's compatibility issues with the 7800 drive train. Why would 7900 RD be compatible with a 7800 cassette but not the other way? What physical dimensions have changed?

User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 15 Mar 2008, 18:13

I'm think it's just the Shifters and Rear Derrailleur that won't be compatible, but the other bits will work better if matched. I guess i'll find out either way in about 1/2 a year.

User avatar
Toff
Posts: 1215
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 14:34
Location: Stanmore

Postby Toff » 15 Mar 2008, 18:17

This is mostly gobbledegook to me, since I use Campy almost exclusively. However, I'm amazed that:
1) There is still no carbon crank
2) Shimano is surrendurring its trademark windwhistler cables: Now how will I be able to tell who is running incompatible equipment whenI need a neutral wheel in a big race?
3) Anyone in their right mind is seriously contemplating electronic shifting again. Why haul a heavy battery everywhere, when you need a backup manual system anyway for when it fails.

User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 15 Mar 2008, 18:42

1) There is already a Carbon Crank available. I still prefer the Alloy Crank, and this new one sounds even better.
2) The cassette is spaced the same from my understanding, so it's just you campy users that will have issues (and those 9spd and under people). SRAM and Shimano will be compatible still.
3) I'm not going with the Electronic Dura-Ace, as you said who wants to lug a battery around, though i suspect there'll be a way to manually select a gear, but it may take getting off the bike to change it.

Anyway, the new Dura-Ace seems to have improved in the areas i wanted it to. Lighter weight, Hidden Cables, and of lesser importance they're adding a bit of carbon to the shifters and rear derrailleur. Another big advantage i see is the increased gear capabilities, 50-34 and 11-28 will replace having a triple in my eyes.

User avatar
weiyun
Posts: 4173
Joined: 17 Nov 2006, 22:32
Location: Birchgrove
Contact:

Postby weiyun » 15 Mar 2008, 20:54

Upping the range of the cassette will just increase the gaps. With a long RD, you can go for something even more anyway.

User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 19 Mar 2008, 17:18

Well, some more news about Shimano. Apparently they've bought the patent for rotor q-rings. http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... hp?t=40812 Could be interesting...

Also, apparently there's some new stuff coming from Campagnolo for next year, but we'll have to wait a bit longer for some more news.

Lastly, SRAM Rival looks to be getting carbons brake levers, and a black finish. 1/2 way down http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... hp?t=40623

User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 21 Mar 2008, 00:16

That Rotor thing turned out to be an early april fools joke, but there is some funny stuff in some of the posts. :lol:

User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 02 Jun 2008, 00:41

Some more Dura-Ace pics, though i don't think the finish is as it will be.
http://www.light-bikes.de/eng/2008/06/0 ... 7900-2009/

On the other hand, Campagnolo think we need 11.......http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d54UU-fPIsY

User avatar
mikesbytes
Posts: 6991
Joined: 13 Nov 2006, 13:48
Location: Tempe
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » 02 Jun 2008, 10:45

Do you mean 11 speed on the rear?

We could get rid of the FD and just use one chain ring to improve on aero.

User avatar
weiyun
Posts: 4173
Joined: 17 Nov 2006, 22:32
Location: Birchgrove
Contact:

Postby weiyun » 02 Jun 2008, 12:19

On the other hand, Campagnolo think we need 11.......http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d54UU-fPIsY
I have also read about it too but have not been able to find any credible sources on that story.

User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 02 Jun 2008, 15:18

Some confirmation about campy here http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum ... sc&start=0
Tiso are apparently also making an 11spd groupset, so it makes sense that campy is, because i suspect tiso will be similar to campy.

More Dura-Ace pics on cyclingnews http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id= ... ace_790008

User avatar
mikesbytes
Posts: 6991
Joined: 13 Nov 2006, 13:48
Location: Tempe
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » 02 Jun 2008, 15:38

From a technical viewpoint, the 10 speed spine is slightly narrower than the 9 speed. If you reclaim the difference, then you only need to narrow by a small margin to get 11 speed.

From a marketing viewpoint, once one company does it, the others will have to follow suit, otherwise they will loose market share.

From a usability viewpoint, who knows? do you have a hole in your current ratio's?

There are those who would argue that 9 speed and 10 speed are inferior to 8 speed.

User avatar
Toff
Posts: 1215
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 14:34
Location: Stanmore

Postby Toff » 02 Jun 2008, 17:36

I think I'll stay with 8-speed thanks. Narrower chains, being forced to bend more and more means much higher likelihood of

1) catastrophic failure;
2) inefficiency, due to shearing friction and lateral pull;
3) wear on thinner cogs, meaning shorter component life;
4) higher servicing costs to keep equipment working properly, due to the tighter tolerances required.

User avatar
T-Bone
Posts: 1933
Joined: 21 Nov 2006, 22:50
Location: Up the Hill

Postby T-Bone » 02 Jun 2008, 18:30

I agree about the durability, though i'm happy with 10 since it's a nice round number.

User avatar
mikesbytes
Posts: 6991
Joined: 13 Nov 2006, 13:48
Location: Tempe
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » 02 Jun 2008, 21:17

Are the cogs actually thinner or just closer together?

User avatar
Toff
Posts: 1215
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 14:34
Location: Stanmore

Postby Toff » 26 Jul 2008, 16:12

Here is a nice video rap of 2009 Dura Ace.

Probably the most comprehensive review of the product I've seen, although you do have to put up with the host's self confessed fanaticism.

http://www.competitivecyclist.com/za/CC ... _VERSION=1

User avatar
Simon Llewellyn
Posts: 1532
Joined: 13 Nov 2006, 22:31
Location: Tempe Velodrome

Postby Simon Llewellyn » 26 Jul 2008, 16:58

"All I can say is WOW!! Really!!?" "& in my opinion really increase sex appeal!!"

He is only a bit fanatical...


Return to “Conversation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest